According to Hobbes, therefore, it is civilization that steps in and rescues humanity from our primal depravity. A far more meaningful question is, given human nature, what environment best reinforces the good? Where this discussion can proceed from there is how much is common in humanity, and is there anything good or bad within this commanality? It is known as one of the unanswerable questions. One could argue that good and evil according to modern definitions are based on morals and if so then what can possibly be perceived as a moral or immoral act? Its interesting as a human myself, I see constant controversy. Anyway, I do want to make it clear I not trying to say humanity is evil, or that we need to exist in the state we have by default, only that I see our nature as inherently evil. Two-year-olds fight over who gets to play with their favorite toy. Confucians, the founder of Confucianism, the official state religion of China for nearly two thousand years, had his own answer to this question, but it provided a somewhat vague explanation.
Human nature, good or bad, can at times be remarkably predictable. We are a dynamic combination of what has been made of us and what we make of ourselves, and the complexity of self identity really cannot be summed up in a simplistic qualititative judgement. In fact the society in which someone has to be good before he can prosper seems to be the rare exception rather the rule. Adolph Hitler, almost single handedly,. Support for good, paraphrase-When one lets themselves be drawn in by subtle, beneficial influences that surround us everywhere, it will be a much easier journey to.
I will say this: Its too bad that rational human beings are so willing to explore human behavior and wonder about how certain thoughts and feeling originated. Hobbes and Rousseau are still with us. Read your Hobbes and your Rousseau and all of your questions will be answered. I think that we have more or less the same position on this issue, not that that is surprising considering how often I look at things in terms of virtues and vices. However, there is one part of the brain that is rather ambiguous to human being. Betty says when she visited the region of France where she hid during the Holocaust that the people who risked their lives to help save her family were simple farmers, still working the land, who just chose to do good.
Well that is my opinion anyway. That means we can't say whether the story is true or not, but it also means that we think these stories are very important. Hobbes felt that the natural state of man was beast-like, and savage. I think the only way you can decide if humanity is inherently good or bad is if you subscribe to some absolute set of morals by which to measure it with. Furthermore, the more kids we have the less resources we have to use and cost of living will continue to rise and poverty will be at its worst. This is the most important part and without it the rest of the body would have no direct, this part is the brain… 1227 Words 5 Pages allowed their evil nature to triumph and, as a result, abused the civil rights of others. See and hear where you stand among the great apes in this audiovisual interactive.
The 5% to are psychopaths they make up 40% of the prison population. Something that is little known to the general population is that these two brands are owned by the same big corporation: Unilever. But it says more practice can help. The results were striking: in every single study, faster—that is, more intuitive—decisions were associated with higher levels of cooperation, whereas slower—that is, more reflective—decisions were associated with higher levels of selfishness. Even if it leads to the suffering of others, that was not the primary goal. As one way of addressing this possibility, the experimenters carried out yet another study.
With that being said, how did we as humans evolve if we are naturally evil and prey on our own people? In fact, some of the other primates are pretty flexible, too! Because we can, but will we? Could it be that Mother Theresa would have easily been a Madoff had she started out with unselfish behaviour and found out that such behaviour would still ensure her survival?. That is to say, that in certain parts of our existence or within a facet of the living form rests a higher concept, a source of character, a source of responsibility. Of course man is evil. If humans want to be good, they have to force it upon themselves. See for a more in-depth analysis, but the evolutionary perspective is that humans have evolved to be both cooperative and competitive, both generous and self-serving. By eating meat we are consuming life. But then Betty shocks me.
You and your stupid antics are truly evil. No really, I couldn't do it. Contrast this… 971 Words 4 Pages view the Bible solely as a divine message from God, immune to critical analysis. We only hear of the bad stuff going on in the news, but every once in a while, someone sneaks a happy story in there. Religious institutions are more and more in the news with both good and bad happenings within. Axe body spray and perfumes for men is known to be one of the most sexist and misogynistic companies around.
Moral judgments are made case-by-case by our moral instincts conscience. Though that gets into a whole other issue, let just say I'd be happy to discuss further or debate it if anyone would like Peace, Conrad Click to expand. Other peoples choices can change what may have happened. Man is not inherently evil. Again, are they only a small percentage of the population involved? I hate these strictly philosophical questions. To find out whether someone is a kind or evil person it is necessary to learn about them, to know their circumstances, and to try and understand why they make the choices they do. And we, in the choices we make, help keep their debate alive.