Is it right for human beings to sacrifice millions of animals for testing purpose? Animal tests must be stopped. Therefore, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of products. When it comes down to it, the word animal testing and animal research are interchangeable, moreover, both relate to the same meaning: the use of animals in scientific experiments. While some supporters consider it as a necessary practice, others believe it involves the torture of animals thus they oppose its use. The debate about the pros and cons of animal experimentation is one that elicits very strong emotions: animal rights activists have resorted to trespass, violence, and death threats. Can lead to misleading research Some medicines and products that are harmful to animals are actually valuable to humans. Animal experimentation is very prevalent nowadays and it became a common and an accepted means of testing by the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
New opportunities for humans as we further our understanding in technology so the use of animals is no longer needed. As a human we have liberty, which is freedom, choice etc. In conclusion, I profoundly believe that despite the vast number of benefits and contribution that animals can grant, the use still has to be minimized. Laws in the United States do not require cosmetics or medicinal drugs to be tested on animals, only that… 1752 Words 7 Pages Animal testing is abusive, ineffective, and should be outlawed. Shocking Facts Did you know that 90 percent of animals used in medical and commercial testing are not protected? Kaiser English 11 29 May 2015 Animal Testing You are one of the 26 million each year chosen to suffer from testing and in laboratories.
Enough animals are dying and suffering in the wild, why do you want to top it up? It would be unethical to perform invasive experimental procedures on human beings before the methods have been tested on animals, and some experiments involve genetic manipulation that would be unacceptable to impose on human subjects before animal testing. Animals feel pain in many of the same ways that humans do; in fact, their reactions to pain are virtually identical both humans and animals scream, for example. People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. They can even produce results that are more relevant than animal experimentation. Posted by: AnonymousReport Post Like Reply00 Animals have feelings to Animal experimentation has been a commonly debated subject for many years, is it cruelty or science? For example, Marla Donato from the Chicago Tribune states Following along, testing on animals is inhumane, and animal testing, an unbearable act, is universally unwanted by all.
So is taking and suffering an animals life necessary and ethical. People all around the world eat meat on the daily like it is no big deal but what they do not know is how a lot of the animals are treated while being raised. Experimentation on animals has been found from as early in 500 as I will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men. Also, treatments that were developed using animals for testing include those for glaucoma, hip dysplasia and pacemakers for heart disease. The legislation would encourage the development of new alternative testing methods and increase the use of testing alternatives that already exist.
However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics companies all across the country and all around the world. The biggest con against animal testing is that it is cruel and inhumane to animals. Countless medical treatments have been developed through the use of animal testing. In most cases, animal testing is unreliable, cruel, and even dangerous. Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. Currently, animals are often used in medical testing, make-up testing, and other consumer product testing. People on both sides of the fence have very strong views.
A mouse may react positively to a treatment while a bird may have a negative reaction. Scientist use animals to try and help find cures for different diseases and cancers in humans. What if you lost your voice and some scientists took you and smeared you in poisen and you couldn't say anything what would you do? Still other people think that animal testing is acceptable because animals are lower species than humans and therefore have no rights. I just don't understand why people forget that the perspectives of the animals are important when meat is involved. Lab animals are cut up and tortured to death all in the name of science. Animal testing is also known as animal experimentation, animal research, and in vivo testing.
Many people in favor of animal testing claim that stories of cruelty are old and out of date and that safeguards such as the are in place to ensure that the animals used in testing are well treated. Overall, such experiments play a vital part in modern medicine. There are many views on this topic that I would like cover in this paper. The laboratory is a cruel place for a innocent animal. Animal experimentation is the use of animals in an experiment to assure the safety and effectiveness of a substance. These animals are subjected to animal testing, the use of animals in order to gain control over the variables that affect our bodies behavior.
For those supporting the use of animals in experiments, the arguments that have been made include possibilities of medical and scientific breakthroughs, safety for humans, and accuracy of results. Unless every product is proven safe for public consumption by these tests, critics will not see the need for conducting them. Animal, Animal testing, Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood 1396 Words 6 Pages Animal testing has been a topic of debate for many generations. This is further supported by the 2013 study in the Archives of Toxicology that states that the lack of direct comparison of human data versus that of a mouse makes the usefulness of research data dubious. It is often said that animals should not be used in testing because it is cruel and unnecessary.
Testing on animals was practiced long ago, and is still practiced today. Many new experiments and laboratory. Experimentation on animals goes way back since the beginning of time. This test is intensely painful for the animal, and blindness, scarring, and death are generally the end results. I don't care how close that ape is to humans, it shouldn't be in a cage in a lab when it's species is dying out in the wild.
Therefore, because effective means of product toxicity testing are available without the use of live animal specimens, testing potentially deadly substances on animals is unnecessary. The world should be against animal testing because, Animals are different from humans, it can be wasteful if the experiment does not work, alternatives can be used instead of animals humanity, multitude amounts of animals are mistreated and eradicated during animal testing. Innocent animals are being brutally killed to serve humans through animal testing for cosmetic products when this brutality could be stopped humans or rodents? Currently, animals are often used in medical testing, make-up testing, and other consumer product testing. Animal, Animal rights, Animal testing 573 Words 3 Pages Animal Testing Why cosmetics on animals has been banned in the E. These include birds, fish, mice and rats.