And if that happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh. Whether large or miniscule, situations that are faced everyday require serious decisions. The people said that the elephant had come suddenly upon him round the corner of the hut, caught him with its trunk, put its foot on his back and ground him into the earth. In the essay he writes not just about his personal experience with the elephant but how metaphorical the experience is to Imperialism and his views on the matter. All this was perplexing and upsetting. He had broken his chains and escaped into the town and the mahout who could control it had given the wrong way to chase the beast and could not be back for twelve hours.
However, more than his own health he was worried for the yellow faces following him. Orwell uses not one but two rifles to kill the elephant and still it keeps breathing and dies half an hour later than Orwell has poured several bullets into it and left the scene. It can be understood however, that the narrator cannot do anything about the situation he is in, as if he goes against the imperialist view point, he would be ridiculed and could be in a dangerous situation. His entire mission as a colonialist, he says, is not to be laughed at—thus, sparing the elephant is not an option. The essay Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell is an example of a persuasive rhetorical piece. Humiliation is an entirely psychic injury, unlike most other forms of injury. From the start, it is clear that he represents the modern, the western industrial English, at complete odds with the rural and primitive Burmese.
Eventually, his final decision was to shoot the elephant and satisfy the natives' hunger for excitement. Somehow it always seems worse to kill a large animal. In spite of his reasoned introspection, he cannot resist the actions that the role forces him to make in order to display his power. Through many examples of animal imagery, as well as the use of diction, Orwell describes the native Burmans as being lesser to Europeans, and in some cases less than human. His description of it is as a complete and totalizing oppressive force, tightly clamped down on Burmese society.
The fate of the elephant lies in his hands. The Burmese sub-inspector and some Indian constables were waiting for me in the quarter where the elephant had been seen. Orwell does not learn from his mistake. It was considered as a political motive because he did not want the other German officer to be disrespect by Burmese people and have a bad experience like him. Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd — seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. In the essay he writes not just about his personal experience with the elephant but how metaphorical the experience is to Imperialism and his views on the matter. Orwell waits for it to die, but it continues to breathe.
The narrative picks up on the day he is called to the other side of town to deal with and elephant that had rampaged through the bazaar. The owner was furious, but the owner was an Indian, so his opinion did not count for much. I did not know what I could do, but I wanted to see what was happening and I got on to a pony and started out. Orwell captures the hearts of readers by revealing the struggles he has while dealing with the burden of his own beliefs and morals. Orwell is able to better understand imperialism through his run-in with the elephant because the elephant serves as a symbol of colonialism.
Only he can make the final decision. And my whole life, every white man's life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at. It deals with his experience as a police-officer in Burma. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly. Orwell wants the reader to trust in Big Brother, who relays his plans out through the Inner Party and the thought police. In Moulmein, Burma, George Orwell is a police officer during a period of intense anti-European sentiment. They all said the same thing: he took no notice of you if you left him alone, but he might charge if you went too close to him.
Various Burmans stopped me on the way and told me about the elephant's doings. Orwell draws a stark picture of the cruelties meted out to the local people by their oppressors. It is clear that the conventions of imperialism make Orwell feel compelled to perform a particular inhumane and irrational role. Audience Analysis -- Audience Profile: My target audience for this summary and response paper is my online English class. The narrator is frequently shown to regard the elephant as higher importance than the people. George Orwell lived in lower Burma where he was a sub- divisional police officer.
Another parallel to how the narrator can be compared to the elephant is through the pronouns he uses to describe the elephant. It is with this logic that it can be said that the narrator is unable to avoid the elephants untimely death. The fear of being made a laughing stock makes him act the way he does the day he shot the elephant. A guilty conscience haunted him, for he truly did not want to commit this murder. The second layer of the story describes the consequences and eventual fall of imperialism. And he already describes the elephant better than he described the Burmans and Natives. Burmans were bringing dash and baskets even before I left, and I was told they had stripped his body almost to the bones by the afternoon.
I did not then know that in shooting an elephant one would shoot to cut an imaginary bar running from ear-hole to ear-hole. His face was coated with mud, the eyes wide open, the teeth bared and grinning with an expression of unendurable agony. As seen in both works done by Machiavelli and Moore, both authors use ethos, logos and pathos to reach out to their audiences. In a job like that you see the dirty work of Empire at close quarters. Yet when Orwell does make use of devices, he explains how they are working. Therefore he presents the elephant as gentle and noble and its death as shocking and long drawn out.
However, not because he is for the Burmese, but because he understands what imperialism really is. Analysis of Shooting an Elephant Introduction Shooting an Elephant is a short story written by George Orwell. Orwell uses other metaphors such as when he compares himself to being a magician about to perform a trick, or as being a lead actor in a piece, and even an absurd puppet, a posing dummy, and to be wearing a mask. While persuasion is most commonly associated with in-your-face advertisements and political speeches, more subtle rhetorical artifacts, such as novels and essays, can contain equally persuasive elements. It is believed that the focal symbolic point would be the narrators stand against the elephant.